Skip to content

Tri X Tmax Comparison Essay

Covering the results of experimenting with Kodak Tri-X 400, article picks up from my original Kodak Tri-X 400 review and will show you single-stop pushes from EI 400 all the way up to EI 12800. It’s also been supplemented with part one of the High EI Shootout, which takes Kodak Tri-X 400, Kodak T-MAX 400, ILFORD HP5 PLUS and ILFORD Delta 400 to EI 12800 and part two, which takes the same films to EI 25600!

All the images featured in this test were metered with the same Sekonic L-308S light meter using a reflective or incident reading, as required.

Got a few hours?

There’s almost to too much to talk about here. I shoot TRI-X in both 35mm and 120 formats and it’s one of the films I carry with me every day (I’m normally walking around with one or two rolls ready to shoot and five rolls loaded in the day pack).

I have the added luxury of being able to develop my own black and white film. One of the (welcome) side-effects of being able to control my own developing process, is that I’m pretty much able to mess around as I feel. Couple this with my zen-like approach to BW development and the results can get “interesting”.

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 400

As I’ve mentioned already a few times, this film is incredibly flexible and will lend itself to almost every lighting condition. Whilst it handles very well in mixed light up to around EI 3200, my experience is that if you find yourself in low or failing natural light, you should over expose this film around half to one stop for the ISO you’re metering it at. If you happen to be indoors with artificial lighting, simply meter for the subject and you should be fine.

If it’s your first time playing around, I’d really suggest bracketing your shots so that you can compare later.

Right, let’s see how far we can push.

Pushing Kodak TRI-X 400

We’re going to start by pushing this film one stop to IE 800 and go up one stop from there until we hit EI 12800 (five stops over box speed). Prepare yourself for a wall of pictures.

TRI-X at ISO800

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 800

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 800

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 800

So far, so good. Pushing the film has naturally bumped the contrast a little. When push processing black and white film I normally try to stick to a stand development with Rodinal at 1:50, or even using a highly diluted concentration of Kodak’s own HC-110. Let’s have a look at EI 1600:

TRI-X at EI 1600

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 1600

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 1600

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 1600

TRI-X at EI 3200

EI 3200 is Kodak’s suggested limit for pushing this film. However we’ll see below that it’ll go much further than that. Let’s take a look at an EI 3200 push below. It actually holds up pretty well. I’m especially happy with the completely unexpected shadow detail in the second shot. Try doing that with a color film, whilst also pushing it three stops.

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 3200

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 3200

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 3200

Pushing film needn’t result in blocked out shadows and super high contrast. If you’re careful with your metering, you can still get fine detail in the shadows.

TRI-X at EI6400

So here we are, pushing one stop faster than the manufacturer’s recommendation. I find that if you’re careful, you can still get useable results. see below.

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 6400

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 6400

Kodak TRI-X 400 – shot at EI 6400

It’s pretty grainy but WOW. The first picture really blows me away. The camera I was using that day is unreliable but has a remarkable lens. I still look for faults in exposure every time I revisit this shot.

TRI-X at EI 12800 – the final push

Here’s the final push, as it were. TRI-X pushed five stops to EI12800. I’ll be honest, I screwed up the development. It was a very grey and rainy day. No light, no fun. BUT the results are still useable, very useable in fact.

Next time I try such a high push, I’ll make sure I choose a day with a little more light!

Kodak TRI-X 12800 – shot at EI 12800

Kodak TRI-X 12800 – shot at EI 12800

Kodak TRI-X 12800 – shot at EI 12800

Kodak TRI-X 12800 – shot at EI 12800

And there we have it

We’re done.  There’s a small part of me that wants to try an EI 25600 push on this film just to see what will happen.  I’ve seen some great results from Ilford HP5+ and Delta 3200 Pro shot at this speed, so you never know what you might find one EMULSIVE in the future. As the last word from me, I’d like to invite you to view the images featured in this experimentation review, as well as Kodak’s Tri-X 400 technical datasheet below.

Write for EMULSIVE

EMULSIVE NEEDS YOU. The driving force behind EMULSIVE is knowledge transfer, specifically creating more of it in the film photography community. You can help by contributing your thoughts, work and ideas to inspire others reading these pages.

To take action and help drive an open, collaborative community all you need do is read this and then drop me a line.

 

 

Lend your support to EMULSIVE

Like what you see here? You can support EMULSIVE by helping to contribute to the community voice on this website (see above), or by heading on over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and considering financial support from as little as $2 a month.

As if that’s not enough, there’s also an EMULSIVE print and apparel store over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique prints of photographs made by yours truly

In short, I want to continue building this platform and I’d love your help to make that happen.

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

We all know a knockoff when we see it. Fake Rolexes, certain Russian motorcycles, and pretty much anything bought off of a street cart in Hong Kong, these poor quality imitators just can’t match their real deal counterparts. It’s no different in the world of film. And one film in particular has garnered a reputation for being just such a cheap copy—Ilford HP5 Plus.

To some old-school photo geeks, HP5 Plus is nothing more than a pale, British imitation of the renowned American black-and-white film, Kodak Tri-X. On forums and blogs everywhere we scarcely see HP5 Plus mentioned without a reference to Tri-X’s alleged superiority. But is HP5 Plus really just a crappy Tri-X cover band, or does it deserve to headline its own world-tour? I think it’s the latter.

For me, Ilford HP5 Plus wrongfully suffers lazy comparisons to Tri-X, and the needlessly reductive judgements that follow are equally misplaced. Those who judge it so are missing the entire point of HP5 plus, and indeed, much of the beauty of this particular film. When we really look at HP5 Plus and judge it on its own merits, we find one of the prettiest black-and-white films on the market and, for those of us in the USA, one of the best values in film photography, period.

Ilford’s HP (Hypersensitive Panchromatic) line of films stem from a lineage that stretches all the way back to 1931, beginning with Ilford’s line of coated glass plates. Four years later in 1935, Ilford would release the roll film version of HP, originally rated at 160 ASA. The HP line of films would go on to see a long history of updates, culminating in the creation of our modern 400 speed HP5 Plus in 1989.

Why am I immediately diving into this historical minutiae? Because it justifies my initial assertion. With a lineage that stretches back to the invention and widespread adoption of 35mm film, it’s hard to ignore the HP line’s historical relevance, and makes it downright impossible to call it a knockoff. Ilford’s been doing HP for as long as Kodak’s been making Tri-X. Case closed? Let’s go further.

If this history fails to give it some street cred, that might be the fault of HP5 Plus’ same-same specs, which do little to differentiate the film in the public’s perception. On paper it’s a humdrum, traditionally-grained, black-and-white film rated at ISO 400. Yeah, sounds like a wannabe Tri-X. But HP5 Plus executes its purpose in a decidedly different manner from Kodak’s old standard.

If Tri-X is the straight-A student with a squeaky clean reputation and an Ivy League scholarship, HP5 Plus is the street-smart kid from public school who somehow manages a 4.0 GPA while working part-time as a bike messenger. It’s a little rough around the edges, but it’s this gritty character that helps it succeed. HP5 Plus possesses a stark, intense tonality that finds itself more at home in the streets and alleyways of the world than in flowerbeds and well-lit studios. Tonal gradation isn’t as silky smooth as other films in this category, but images made with it have a gritty character that’s hard to match.

One thing that jumps out about HP5 Plus is its unique rendering of shadows. The film retains less shadow detail than other films in its segment, but that isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Instead of details predictably fading gently into the shadows, it seems the entire image gets sculpted from out of those shadows. Dark tones in general seem to be painted onto the emulsion in India ink with a broad but supremely accurate brush. Combine that with black-and-white film’s incredible highlight latitude and one can make images that “pop” like no other.

It would be easy at this point to accuse HP5 Plus as merely being an unsubtle battering ram of visual intensity, but that would be misguided. Ilford’s film can actually show subtlety and precision with panache due to its remarkable sharpness. In the right developer, HP5 Plus sharpens up nicely; what’s more, it compliments this sharpness with its traditional cubic grain structure. When shot at box speed, grain is certainly present, but it somehow doesn’t get in the way of sharpness or resolution. What’s more, its grain is just plain pretty.

But being just another good, average speed black-and-white film doesn’t explain its longevity. 400 speed black-and-white films are expected to have an insane amount of latitude, and that means one thing—pushability. And boy, can HP5 Plus be pushed. When shot at ISO 1600, HP5 Plus doesn’t just look great, it becomes my absolute favorite black-and-white film. The already grave tonality becomes even more stark when pushed to its extremes. Shadows and highlights seem brushed onto massive bits of grain, and every scene takes on that intense and beautiful photojournalistic look of yesteryear.

While HP5 Plus is an old-school film with an old-school look, it retains a usability that is distinctly modern. The good people at Ilford made sure that HP5 Plus behaves well in both the scanner and the enlarger, and they did so with one simple trick—they made it dry completely flat.

For avid scanners of film, there is no greater blessing in this world than a negative that is already completely flat. No sorcery or ingenuity is required to get the film to straighten or lay flat, which shortens scanning time considerably. That means more time working with the actual image, more time editing, more time shooting. This is more than can be said of other films, which is a shame considering how essential film flatness is to today’s digital workflow.

If all that wasn’t good enough, HP5 Plus beats out its competitors handily in one of the most important categories for film (and for anything, really)—price. Here in the United States, it’s one of the least expensive 35mm traditionally grained 400 speed black-and-white films on the market. It’s also available in about any format you could ever need. Sheet film, medium format, 100-foot bulk rolls for an even cheaper cost per roll; it even comes in single-use disposable cameras.

If ever there was a black-and-white film for the shooter on a budget, HP5 Plus is it.

All this praise begs the question: does this film have any real weaknesses? The answer is yes, sort of. HP5 Plus happens to suffer from the same problem as Tri-X; namely, it’s one of those films whose signature look is both its greatest asset and its worst liability. Sure, we shoot it for that grainy, stark look, but the film falls a little short when used for sweeping landscapes or portraits where we expect a smoother tonality and a more precise sharpness. Its characteristic high contrast and deep shadow rendition means that some fine detail gets lost in the emulsion, and that may serve to bug more technical shooters.

But expecting clinical precision from HP5 Plus misses the point. The beauty of the film isn’t in the way it renders detail; it’s in the way it renders an entire scene, and by extension, the world around us. HP5 Plus bestows that gritty, intense atmosphere to every shot and it’s a look that, over the course of nearly eighty years, has aged extremely well.

Are there other films that can give us that atmosphere? Sure. Are there films that are more technically impressive? Of course. But do they do it like HP5 Plus? Nope. And that’s what keeps me coming back for more.


About the author: Josh Solomon is a photo geek, musician, and student from Los Angeles. When not playing jazz around L.A. or jamming with his band, Young Lovers, he’s shooting film through timeless, mechanical cameras. This post originally appeared on Casual Photophile.

Tags: blackandwhite, blackandwhitefilm, comparison, film, filmphotography, hp5plus, ilford, ilfordhp5plus, Kodak, kodaktrix, trix